Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1998No. COA97-1573PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Pertinent facts and procedural information include the following: During a 12 April 1996 Industrial Commission Hearing concerning plaintiff’s request for additional workers’ compensation benefits, plaintiff testified to her pre-existing cerebral palsy condition to refute contentions that her cerebral palsy caused her recent 1995 foot problems. Plaintiff testified, in part, that she had suffered from cerebral palsy since birth and at age four underwent bilateral heel cord lengthening. She also testified she had not been treated or had problems with her cerebral palsy since age…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Matter of GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Hoyle v. Carolina Associated MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Peagler v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Johnson v. Herbie's PlaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Pitillo v. N.C. Department of Environmental Health & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Moore v. Federal ExpressCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Gordon v. City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API