Legal Opinion

City of Opelika v. Daniel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1877PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Montgomery. Heard before the Hon. Huriosco Austill. The facts are contained in the opinion. 1. The equity of the bill is unassailable.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Montgomery. Heard before the Hon. Huriosco Austill. The facts are contained in the opinion. 1. The equity of the bill is unassailable. It rests on the familiar doctrine that, although the bonds have been declared void, they are negotiable paper, payable to the bearer, not yet due, and may pass into the hands of bona fide holders for value, who may subject the city of Opelika to harrassing suits and expensive annoyance.—1 Vesey, 3; 1 John’s Chan. Hep. 517 ; 1 Story Eq. Jur. §§ 695 to 705-706 ; Higb on Inj. §§ 7097-12; 24 Ala. 355; Willard’s Eq. Jnr. 358-361; 9…

1Opinion of the Court

MANNING, J.—

In this cause, the prayer for an injunction, and other relief, is based on two grounds. One of them is, that the “ act to authorize the several counties, and towns and cities of the State of Alabama, to subscribe to the capital stock of such railroads throughout the State as they may consider most conducive to their respective interests,”—approved December 31st, 1868,—was not passed in conformity with the constitution; and that the city bonds of Opelika, now in controversy and purporting to have been issued by virtue of said act, are therefore void. But it has very lately been…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Ableman v. BoothSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  3. James L. v. CarrylSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  4. Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. Hyde v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1858

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gill v. MoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Gay, Hardie & Co. v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Craig & Bumgardner v. Hoge & HutchinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  4. E. E. Yarbrough Turpentine Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Lake Bistenbau Lumber Co. v. MimmsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API