Ableman v. Booth
Supreme Court of the United States
These two cases were brought up from tbe Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin by a writ of error issued under the 25th section of the judiciary act. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taney
The plaintiff in error in the first of these eases is the marshal Of the United States for the district of Wisconsin, and the two eases have arisen out of the same transaction, and depend, ■to some extent, upon the same principles. On that account, they have been argued and considered together; and the following are the facts as they appear in the transcripts before ■ us:
Sherman M. Booth was charged before Winfield Smith, a commissioner duly appointed .by the District Court of the United States for the district of Wisconsin, with having, on the 11th day of March, 1854, aided and abetted, at…
2Cited by270 opinions
- Cooper v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
265 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.