Legal Opinion

Lake Bistenbau Lumber Co. v. Mimms

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 10, 1897No. 12,367PublishedCited by 11 opinions

A PPEAL from the Second. Judicial District Court for the Parish of Webster. Watkins, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McEnery, J.

The Lane & Bodley Company, intervenors, mortgage creditors of H. S. Mathews, obtained judgment against him. Execution issued on this judgment and the mortgaged property was •seized. ,

The plaintiff company enjoined the seizure. Lane & Bodley filed an intervention and third opposition. The sheriff filed the usual answer in such eases.

After the seizure the Federal Court appointed a receiver for the Lake Bisteneau Lumber Company. The receiver filed an exception of no cause of action to the opposition, which was overruled. The receiver resigned.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ober v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Hawes v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  3. Anthony v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  4. City of Opelika v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. STATE Ex Rel. MARSTON v. MARSTONSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Terry v. NugentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  4. Lucas v. LucasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Jennings-Heywood Oil Syndicate v. Houssiere-Latreille Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API