Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Falkenhan

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1892No. 14398PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

This is an appeal by the defendant corporation from that part of the judgment which authorizes judgment against that defendant.

The action is brought upon a promissory note executed by the other defendant to the appellant, and is not negotiable, because it contains a stipulation for an attorney’s fee.

In the complaint the note is set out at length, and it is averred “ that on the thirtieth day of August, 1888, before the maturity of said note, the defendant, the Coronado Beach Company, for a valuable consideration, waived protest in writing thereon, and indorsed said note in blank,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dean v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Patterson v. PoindexterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  3. Brenzer v. WightmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  4. Leidy v. TammanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Mason v. LuceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-Operative Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  4. Haber v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Kendall v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API