Legal Opinion

Bell's Administratrix v. Golding

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1866PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtRay, C. J.

At the February term, 1866, of the Court of Common Pleas of Marion county, Charles N. Golding and Jeptha L. Holton, for the use of said Golding, filed their complaint against the appellant.

The complaint avers that the appellant is the administratrix of Robert A. Bell, deceased; that she was duly appointed as such by the proper court of Jefferson county, Kentucky; that the decedent left, at the time of his death, a large amount of personal property, exceeding in value |15,000, in Marion county, Indiana, which appellant has taken into her possession and control, thereby becoming responsible as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Ætna Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Rice v. RiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Crabb v. Atwood & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Selden v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Reissner v. OxleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Chamberlain v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Mattox v. HightshueIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Fitzsimons v. FreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Johnson v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API