Legal Opinion

Crow v. Capitol Bankers Life Insurance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1995No. 21099PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROST, Justice.

In applying for a life insurance policy from Capitol Bankers Life Insurance Company (Capitol), Edward and Kathy Crow made misrepresentations about Kathy’s health history. As required by New Mexico law, the policy contained an incontestability’ clause, stating that, after two years from the date the policy was issued, the coverage could not be challenged. Kathy died of ovarian cancer less than two years after the policy was issued. Upon learning of the misrepresentations, Capitol denied payment of death benefits to Edward. Edward filed suit claiming that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Company of America v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Madawick Contracting Co. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Modisette v. Foundation Reserve Insurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Udall v. Colonial Penn InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Tsosie v. Foundation Reserve Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. AFSCME Council 18Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  2. Thi of New Mexico at Vida Encantada, LLC v. LovatoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
  3. Western Farm Bureau Insurance v. CarterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Montoya v. Financial Federal Credit, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
  5. Health Plus of New Mexico, Inc. v. HarrellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API