Legal Opinion

Culp v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 10, 1925No. 13099PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER OURIAM.

In this ease defendants below demurred to plaintiff’s petition. The demurrer was overruled, defendants excepted. but refused to elect to stand on their demurrer. In the journal entry overruling the demurrer we find this language:

‘‘Further orders to plead in said cause will be made or taken in accordance with the judgment of the Supreme Court as will appear from the mandate therein.”

No further judgment in the case was either rendered or entered, therefore, under authorities of Exchange Oil Company v. Crews et al., 90 Okla. 245, 216 Pac. 674, and Stebbins et al. v. Edwards, 107 Okla.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Exchange Oil Company v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Stebbins v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Freeman v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGrath v. RoremSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Jones v. ToomeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Waldock v. State Ex Rel. FinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Hopper v. StewardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. State Ins. Fund v. TrieschmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API