Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter Wolak, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1975No. 74--1977PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying petitioner’s motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The single issue presented for bur consideration is whether the district judge erred when she failed to explain to defendant, when he indicated a lack of understanding, that a consequence of his guilty plea would be the mandatory imposition of a three year parole term in addition to any custodial sentence. We determine that there was error and reverse and remand with instructions to vacate the conviction and sentence to allow petitioner to plead anew.

On August 7, 1973,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Thomas Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  4. Collier Lee Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip CimminoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Alan Louis BasharaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Claude Francis Roddy, Jr. v. Harold E. Black, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Joseph Del Vecchio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. James W. Armstrong v. Charles E. Egeler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API