Thomas Harris v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McCREE, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S. C. § 2255, petitioner contends that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 prohibited acceptance of his guilty plea because the trial judge did not inform him that ineligibility for parole was a statutory consequence of any sentence which could be imposed for the offense charged in the indictment. We agree.
The rule provides, in pertinent part, that the court “shall not accept [a plea of guilty] * * * without first * * * determining that the plea is made voluntarily with understanding of the nature…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Anthony Joseph Munich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Epifanio Trujillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- William R. Durant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. William C. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Donald P. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Robert Bye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- State ex rel. LeBlanc v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Arnold Gates v. United States of America, Felix Melian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.