Legal Opinion

Thomas Harris v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1970No. 19751_1PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCREE, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S. C. § 2255, petitioner contends that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 prohibited acceptance of his guilty plea because the trial judge did not inform him that ineligibility for parole was a statutory consequence of any sentence which could be imposed for the offense charged in the indictment. We agree.

The rule provides, in pertinent part, that the court “shall not accept [a plea of guilty] * * * without first * * * determining that the plea is made voluntarily with understanding of the nature…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Anthony Joseph Munich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Epifanio Trujillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. William R. Durant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. William C. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Donald P. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. Robert Bye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. State ex rel. LeBlanc v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  5. Arnold Gates v. United States of America, Felix Melian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API