Commonwealth v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This appeal is from the judgment of sentence for indecent assault. Appellant contends that the sentence imposed was an abuse of discretion because (1) the court failed to state on the record adequate reasons for the sentence imposed; (2) the probation department’s pre-sentence report was bi ased; and (3) the ten-month minimum sentence was inappropriate. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
Appellant was charged with the indecent assault of a six-year-old girl. On January 14, 1987, a jury found appellant guilty of indecent assault. Following post-verdict motions, appellant was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. DeversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. KrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. GambalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BillettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Cruz-CentenoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. FrankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. CozzoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. DickersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.