Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dickerson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1991No. 01673PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from the judgment of sentence imposed following appellant’s guilty plea to charges of rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, and possessing instruments of crime. Appellant contends that the sentence imposed was an abuse of discretion because it was harsh and excessive under the circumstances. In addition, he contends that sentencing counsel was ineffective for failing to (1) object to the imposition of a mandatory sentence pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 9714, and (2) object to the prosecutor’s erroneous computation of the sentencing guideline ranges. For the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. SessomsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. McClinticSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. DickersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. GonzalesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. BeattySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API