State v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
{¶ 1} The issue we address in this case is whether an appellate court should apply a de novo or an abuse-of-discretion standard when reviewing a trial court’s determination of whether a defendant’s offenses should merge pursuant to R.C. 2941.25. We hold that a reviewing court should review the trial court’s R.C. 2941.25 determination de novo.
Factual and Procedural Background
{¶ 2} The alleged victim in this case, J.W., was the eight-year-old niece of defendant-appellee, Jason Williams. On June 22, 2009, Williams and his niece were among a group of people gathered at the home of the victim’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by421 opinions
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. BaileyOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
416 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.