Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2012No. 2011-0619PublishedCited by 421 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} The issue we address in this case is whether an appellate court should apply a de novo or an abuse-of-discretion standard when reviewing a trial court’s determination of whether a defendant’s offenses should merge pursuant to R.C. 2941.25. We hold that a reviewing court should review the trial court’s R.C. 2941.25 determination de novo.

Factual and Procedural Background

{¶ 2} The alleged victim in this case, J.W., was the eight-year-old niece of defendant-appellee, Jason Williams. On June 22, 2009, Williams and his niece were among a group of people gathered at the home of the victim’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by421 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. BaileyOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

416 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API