Legal Opinion

State v. Ruff

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2015No. 2013-1441PublishedCited by 785 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to revisit the holding in State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, with respect to when two or more offenses are allied offenses of similar import. Because the circumstances of when offenses are of dissimilar import within the meaning of R.C. 2941.25(B) have been unclear, we hold that offenses with resulting harm that is separate and identifiable are offenses of dissimilar import. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Case Background

{¶ 2} A jury convicted appellee, Kenneth Ruff, of the rape of three women,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by785 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Williams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. Dean (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. Myers (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. BaileyOhio Supreme Court · 2022

780 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API