Legal Opinion

Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Free

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 21, 1949No. 4 Div. 540PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a suit for damages by appellee against appellant growing out of a collision of a truck of appellant with plaintiff’s automobile. The trial was with a jury. One question was whether the driver of the truck was acting in the line and scope of his employment in driving it.

The Court ‘ of Appeals, recognizing the existence of an administrative presumption against appellant on the evidence in that connection here presented, held that there was no conflict in the evidence nor conflicting inferences from it, to the effect that the driver was without the line and scope of his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilkes v. Stacy Williams Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Hendricks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Robison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Wigfield v. AkridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Luquire Ins. Co. v. ParkerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. Lyle v. Winston CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Green v. First National Bank of TuskaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. FreeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Green v. First National Bank of TuskaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API