Legal Opinion
Wilkes v. Stacy Williams Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 17, 1938No. 6 Div. 147PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice. ,
This is an action at law for the recovery of damages for the breach of a contract of employment as a sales broker between plaintiff and the Stacy Williams Company, a partnership composed of Stacy Williams and Claude Bennett, and for services rendered and accepted under the contract after defendant undertook to terminate it. It was dated January 1, 1929, and was to continue for ten years thereafter. The defendant is “The * Stacy Williams Company, Inc.,” a corporation.
The corporation was formed on the 1st day of July, 1929, with a capital stock of $10,000, divided into 100…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Moore & Handley Hardware Co. v. Towers Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Andres v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1900
- Reed v. Ridout's Ambulance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Barnes v. DaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- UNION MORTG. CO., INC. v. BarlowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Ex Parte Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Mary G. Roebling v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Hendricks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.