Legal Opinion

Green v. First National Bank of Tuskaloosa

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 7, 1972No. 6 Div. 892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff sued defendant on open account. The case was tried by a jury and verdict and judgment thereon were for plaintiff. On appeal, for the failure of the trial court to give to the jury the general affirmative charge without hypothesis for defendant, the Court of Civil Appeals, 49 Ala.App. 426, 272 So.2d 895 reversed and rendered judgment for defendant. The plaintiff contends that the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals is error.

Plaintiff sued on an account arising out of the use of charge cards issued by plaintiff to defendant and her husband. The Court of Civil…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Wilkes v. Stacy Williams Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Hendricks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Green v. First National Bank of TuskaloosaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  5. Lyle v. Winston CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Emanuel v. McGriffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte Bunting Plastic Surgery ClinicSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Green v. First National Bank of TuskaloosaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. Emanuel v. McGriffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Ex Parte Bunting Plastic Surgery ClinicSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API