Legal Opinion

Pederson v. First National Bank of Superior

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1966PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The facts are substantially undisputed. It appears that Anton and Bertha Laursen were in their mid-eighties in 1956 when they requested Attorney D. E. Jensen to prepare wills. Discussions between the Laursens and Attorney Jensen led to the preparation of wills and an agreement which purported to limit the right of the parties to alter these wills. The general effect of the 1956 testamentary transaction was the execution of separate wills that were mutual and reciprocal and identical in that they bequeathed all of the property of each to the surviving spouse and provided, in the event of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doyle v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Vogt, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Allen v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Ranney v. McLeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Chandler v. Estate of RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chayka v. SantiniWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Goebel v. National Exchangors, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Mansfield v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Boutelle v. ChrislawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Sipple v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API