Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Estate of Rogers

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Two issues are presented on this appeal: First, does the execution and nonrevocation of a will pursuant to an oral understanding to execute mutual wills constitute sufficient part performance?

Second, is a claim based on an oral agreement to execute mutual wills barred by the provisions of sec. 238A9, Stats.?

Part Performance.

An oral contract to devise real estate falls within the statute of frauds, sec. 240.08, Stats., 2 and is void 3 un less appellant’s execution and nonrevocation of a will in accordance with the agreement constitutes sufficient part performance 4 so as to remove the case…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Doyle v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hale v. HaleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894
  3. Brown v. WebsterNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Canada v. IhmsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Gould v. MansfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chayka v. SantiniWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Meyer v. Texas National Bank of Commerce of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Wamser v. BambergerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Gename v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Pederson v. First National Bank of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API