Legal Opinion

Marvin v. United States (In Re Marvin)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 31, 1992No. 19-20862PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

JAMES E. SHAPIRO, Bankruptcy Judge.

The controversy at hand is whether the damages under Wis.Stat. § 26.09 (which provides for the recovery by a landowner of double damages against one who unlawfully cuts, removes and transports timber) are a “fine, penalty or forfeiture” within the meaning of § 523(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code.

This issue has been presented on cross motions for summary judgment and upon a stipulation of facts. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Before this bankruptcy petition was filed, the defendant, United States of America (“USA”), had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Lisk v. Criswell (In Re Criswell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1985
  3. Bryan v. Manley (In Re Manley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Illinois Ex Rel. Burris v. Tapper (In Re Tapper)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  5. Hines v. Tanner (In Re Tanner)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meyer v. RigdonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Meyer v. RigdonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Levine v. Ward (In Re Ward)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
  4. South Bend Community School Corp. v. EgglestonDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
  5. Ganther Construction, Inc. v. Ward (In Re Ward)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API