Marvin v. United States (In Re Marvin)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
JAMES E. SHAPIRO, Bankruptcy Judge.
The controversy at hand is whether the damages under Wis.Stat. § 26.09 (which provides for the recovery by a landowner of double damages against one who unlawfully cuts, removes and transports timber) are a “fine, penalty or forfeiture” within the meaning of § 523(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code.
This issue has been presented on cross motions for summary judgment and upon a stipulation of facts. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).
Before this bankruptcy petition was filed, the defendant, United States of America (“USA”), had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Lisk v. Criswell (In Re Criswell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1985
- Bryan v. Manley (In Re Manley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1992
- Illinois Ex Rel. Burris v. Tapper (In Re Tapper)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Hines v. Tanner (In Re Tanner)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Meyer v. RigdonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Meyer v. RigdonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Levine v. Ward (In Re Ward)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- South Bend Community School Corp. v. EgglestonDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- Ganther Construction, Inc. v. Ward (In Re Ward)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009