Legal Opinion
Illinois Ex Rel. Burris v. Tapper (In Re Tapper)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 24, 1991No. 19-00547PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON ATTORNEY GENERAL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge.
Plaintiff Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois (“Attorney General”, “Plaintiff”), on behalf of twenty consumers (“Consumers”), moved pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(2)(A), 523(a)(7) for entry of summary judgment finding nondis-chargeability of debt adjudged by an Illinois Court to be due from Debtor Alex Tapper (“Debtor”). Having considered the argument of counsel and pleadings and materials filed, for reasons stated below the Plaintiffs Amended Motion is granted as…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Banner Oil Co. v. Bryson (In Re Bryson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Stevens v. Antonious (In Re Antonious)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Strominger v. Giquinto (In Re Giquinto)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Fezler v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Joseph A. Thompson, Debtor. Joseph A. Thompson v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.