Madonna v. Tamarack Air, Ltd.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Tamarack Air, Ltd. negligently damaged James Madonna’s airplane while it was on Tamarack’s airfield after it had been in Tamarack’s shop for routine maintenance. Tamarack offered to fix the plane, but Madonna refused that offer. Instead, he elected to ship the plane to Wyoming and had the plane repaired at the original factory. Tamarack argued that Madonna had failed to mitigate his damages and refused to compensate Madonna for the full cost of these repairs. A jury awarded Madonna most, but not all, of the cost of having the plane repaired out of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- O.K. Lumber Co. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Peterson v. EkAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc. v. SheehanAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Davis v. DykmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jude M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Cora G. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS, Justin D. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Young v. KellyAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Merdes & Merdes, P.C. v. Leisnoi, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Douglas Galipeau v. Briana Bixby and Mei-Lani BixbyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.