Legal Opinion

Abel Construction Co. v. School District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1972No. 38075PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClinton, J.

This is an action by Abel Construction Company, plaintiff, to recover from the defendant, School District of Seward, $5,175 alleged to be the balance owed upon a contract for the construction of an athletic track with a rubber asphalt resilient surface and other improvements at the Seward high school. The contract provided for liquidated damages of $75 for each day completion of the construction extended beyond the specified 60-calendar day “contract period.” The defendant had withheld the liquidated damages for a claimed completion delay of 69 days. The trial judge determined as a matter of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. MoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Pasadena City Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Rodine v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Sofio v. GlissmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Stanford Motor Co. v. WestmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Space Master International, Inc. v. City of WorcesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Rohlin Construction Co. v. City of HintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. Growney v. C M H Real Estate Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Berens & Tate v. Iron Mt. Info. Mgmt.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. John F. Kealy and Robert M. Snell, Doing Business as Partners Under the Partnership Name of Mid-Plains Development Company v. Roger L. HarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API