Legal Opinion

Growney v. C M H Real Estate Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1976No. 40182PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.

This is an action to recover a downpayment on a contract to purchase real estate. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff-pur chaser. We reverse the judgment of the District Court.

Plaintiff alleges a contemporaneous oral agreement to the effect that the contract was to be void if it were ascertained that the property purchased was not suitable for the construction of a swimming pool; also, that defendants misrepresented the property as being suitable for the construction of a swimming pool.

The record reflects that plaintiff and a Russell E. Clark, Jr., were interested in buying a home with a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. SWANSON PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. CumberlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Abel Construction Co. v. School District of SewardNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Abel Construction Co. v. School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Camfield v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Erftmier v. EickhoffNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. J-R Grain Co. v. Fac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. Kozlik v. Emelco, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Berens & Tate v. Iron Mt. Info. Mgmt.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API