Legal Opinion

United States v. Elkins

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided March 6, 2000No. 96-20152 DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS

DONALD, District Judge.

Before the court are the motions of the defendants, James Elkins and Carol El-kins, to suppress evidence gained from searches of their various properties, which were conducted both without and pursuant to warrants. 1 The United States opposes the motions. Evidentiary hearings were conducted August 30-31, September 1-3, October 25-26, and 28, 1999, pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). See also United States v. Atkin, 107 F.3d…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. James Elkins Carol Elkins, United States of America v. Carol Elkins James ElkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Joselin CastroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. WoodwardDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2001
  4. United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API