Legal Opinion

United States v. Woodward

District Court, D. Maine

Decided January 29, 2001No. CRIM. 00-86-P-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS AND FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY

GENE CARTER, District Judge.

The Court now has before it Defendants’ Motion to Suppress, in which they seek suppression of all evidence seized from their residence and any evidence derived from the search of their residence. Docket No. 12. Specifically, Defendants argue that the use of a thermal imaging device without a warrant to do so violates each Defendant’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and that the warrant ultimately issued was itself based on an illegal search. Id.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HolmesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API