Legal Opinion
Crozier-Straub, Inc. v. Maryland Concrete Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 12, 1930No. 1566PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, District Judge.
The bill of complaint in this ease was filed by Crozier-Straub, Inc., owner of United States patent, No. 1,212,840, to Francis J. Straub, and Cinder Block Corporation, exclusive Eeemsee under that patent in Baltimore, against the Maryland Concrete Corporation. The bill charges infringement of the patent, and prays for an injunction and an accounting for damages and profits.
The patent relates to a buEding block and a method of making the same. The object of the patent, the method pursued, and the quahties of the resulting product are described in the following quotation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Weber Electric Co. v. E. H. Freeman Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Imperial Bottle Cap & Machine Co. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1905
- American Cone & Wafer Co. v. DenaroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Ready Auto Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atlas Powder Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- Samson Granite Co. v. Crozier Straub, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
- Standard Stoker Co. v. Berkley Mach. Works & Foundry Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1938