Legal Opinion

Imperial Bottle Cap & Machine Co. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 7, 1905No. 506PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland.

1Opinion of the Court

BRAWEEY, District Judge.

The validity of the Painter patent, No. 468,258, which the court below adjudged to have been infringed by defendants, was not challenged in the argument here when the case was submitted, but pending our consideration of the appeal, and prior to decision, the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit delivered its opinion in Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Standard Stopper Co., 136 Fed. 841, holding this patent invalid for want of patentable novelty. In view of the importance of having uniformity of adjudication in the federal tribunals, especially in patent causes, where…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Aluminum Stopper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1901
  4. Fuller v. YentzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Electric Railroad Signal Co. v. Hall Railway Signal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gulf Smokeless Coal Co. v. Sutton, Steele & Steele.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. Williams Bros. Well Treating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. Kay Patents Corp. v. Martin Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  4. National Mach. Corp. v. Benthall Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
  5. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. United States Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API