Legal Opinion

Standard Stoker Co. v. Berkley Mach. Works & Foundry Co.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided October 26, 1938No. Nos. 233-235Published

1Opinion of the Court

WAY, District Judge.

The above numbered suits have by consent been heard and considered together. The suits were instituted in July, 1931, but allowed by the parties to remain dormant on the docket until the Court on its own motion ordered that they be' tried or dismissed. Plaintiff charges defendant with the infringement of five patents of which plaintiff is the sole owner, having acquired the patents and all rights therein through valid assignments. The patents are:(1) Lower patent No. 1,373,748, relating to locomotive stokers. This patent was granted April 5, 1921, to an assignee of Nathan…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Leitch Manufacturing Co. v. Barber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Shepard v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API