Legal Opinion
United States v. Nieto
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided February 21, 2017No. 16-0301/ARPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge OHLSON
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Pursuant to Appellant’s conditional pleas, a military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial convicted Appellant of four specifications of abusive sexual contact and one specification each of being absent without leave, violating a general order, making a false official statement, and making an indecent visual recording, in violation of Articles 86, 92, 107, 120, and 120c, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 892, 907, 920, 920c (2012). The military judge sentenced Appellant to a reduction to E-l, forfeiture of all pay and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. DarnallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. BavenderCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2021
- United States v. BavenderUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
- United States v. BinghamUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
- United States v. BlackburnUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.