Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Ingram

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1994No. 79637PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice:

The first question is whether a will severs a valid joint tenancy so that jointly held property passes through the estate rather than to the surviving joint tenant. We hold that it does not. The second question is whether bank accounts described as “joint”, but lacking, as far as we can find, any language of “survivorship”, create a valid joint tenancy. We find that under the facts of this case they do not.

Lola Jane Ingram established a savings account and a checking account, and on each of these accounts named as a co-signor Shirley Gazalski, one of her daughters. Ingram…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cacy v. CacySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Peyton v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Easterling v. FerrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Shackelton v. SherrardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Clovis v. ClovisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  3. Samson Resources Co. v. SemCrude, L.P. (In re SemCrude, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  4. Delk v. Markel American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Toma v. TomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API