Legal Opinion
United States v. Roosevelt Anderson, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 19, 2013No. 05-16992PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
Roosevelt Anderson, Jr., appeals his conviction for criminal copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 506(a)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2319(b)(1). Anderson contends that the district court erred: (1) by giving an incorrect jury instruction on willfulness; (2) by allowing the government to introduce evidence of uncharged acts of infringement; and (3) in calculating restitution. Applying the willfulness standard for criminal copyright cases as recently clarified in United States v. Liu, 731 F.3d 982 (9th Cir.2013), we conclude that the jury instruction was flawed but…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Washington Shoe Company v. A-Z Sporting Goods IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Fernando Vizcarra-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Kwame KilpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Henry LoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Randly BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Sylvia Walter-EzeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. FerdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.