Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Fell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1977No. D. D. No. 77-3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The board found that Fell (a specialist in the field of Workmen’s Compensation law), having understood that it had been the long established practice of the Industrial Commission to deny any claim for permanent-total disability benefits upon notice of the death of the claimant, deliberately withheld information concerning his client’s death prior to the hearing on the motion concerning the claim. The board concluded that Fell’s primary motive in withholding such information was to gain for himself a fee to which he was not entitled, but yet received.

DR 1-102(A) provides, in part:

“A lawyer…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Virzi v. Grand Trunk Warehouse & Cold Storage Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  3. In Re ForrestSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API