Legal Opinion

Virzi v. Grand Trunk Warehouse & Cold Storage Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 29, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-71223PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILMORE, District Judge.

This case raises an important issue relating to the ethical obligation of an attorney to inform opposing counsel and the Court, prior to concluding a settlement, of the death of his client. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the Court holds the attorney has an absolute ethical obligation to do so, and sets aside the settlement ordered in this matter.

I

This is a personal injury diversity action. Pursuant to the authority contained in Rule 32 of the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, 1 the case was referred to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simons v. Schiek's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Newman v. FjelstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Spaulding v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. FellOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Anita Harmon, as an Individual and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Euella PotterWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Eagan Ex Rel. Keith v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Harris v. JacksonKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re SeeligSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  5. Kath v. Western Media, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API