Legal Opinion

Horton v. . Wilson Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sea well,

J. Tbe Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 — Act of 25 June,

1938, chapter 676; 52 Stat. 1060; 29 U. S. C. A., secs. 201-219 — with some exceptions not pertinent to this case, provides a schedule of minimum wages and maximum hours for every employee “who is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.” Secs. 6 (a) and 7 (a). Section 3 (b) defines commerce as used in the Act as follows: “ 'commerce’ means trade, commerce, transportation, transmission or communication among the several states or from any state to any place outside thereof.”

It has been said that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Hammer v. DagenhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Wood v. Central Sand & Gravel Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Rodgers v. Wright's Provisions, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
  3. Greene v. . Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Greene v. Anchor Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API