Rodgers v. Wright's Provisions, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS. OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER
DONALD RUSSELL, District Judge.
This is an action to recover overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. See. 201 et seq. The defendant-employer operates a small meat packing plant in Anderson, South Carolina.1 The plaintiff was, at the time set forth in the complaint, employed in the packing cooler department of such plant. The period for which overtime wages are sought preceded the ef*138feetive date of the amendment of 1966, reducing the value definition of “enterprise” under the Act, Section 203 (r), 29 U.S.C.A.; and,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bracey v. LurayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lasater v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1980