Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Howard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1988No. 522PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

Appellant, Wayne Howard, appeals from judgment of sentence of five to ten years imprisonment imposed after his original sentence of two concurrent terms of sixteen months to sixty months imprisonment was vacated pursuant to Commonwealth v. Wright, 508 Pa. 25, 494 A.2d 354 (1985), affirmed sub. nom McMillan v. Pennsylvania, 477 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 2411, 91 L.Ed.2d 67 (1986). Appellant contends that in light of his good behavior on parole from the vacated sentence, the new sentence is excessive and disproportionate and therefore constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. We affirm.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. EhrsamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CartretteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. SeskeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. StrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. CatanchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API