Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Strunk

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1990No. 349PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

On appeal we consider whether a state imposing a 90-day driver’s license suspension based upon an underaged defendant’s conviction of merely possessing an alcoholic beverage, violates the defendant’s substantive due process rights or the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, where the violation was not connected to the possession or operation of a motor vehicle. We conclude that the imposition of the 90-day license suspension did not violate either the defendant’s substantive due process rights or his right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.

On July 21, 1989,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Eisenberg, M., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Plowman v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. YasipourSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. People v. BoeckmannIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Johnson v. State Hearing Examiner's OfficeWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API