Commonwealth v. Catanch
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
This is a direct appeal from a judgment of sentence following a nolo contendere plea. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
The facts underlying this appeal, as determined by the trial court, are as follows:
[Appellant] entered the enclosed MAC machine area of Mellon Bank, located at 5500 Germantown Avenue, at 1:00 on the afternoon of December 15, 1988. He then pointed a loaded revolver at Philip Weiser, and demanded money. While the [appellant] was accosting Weiser, an elderly gentleman, Mr. Tucker, came into the area, and the [appellant] similarly confronted him. Dr. Weiser…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. DeversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. TuckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. McClendonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.