Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Catanch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1990No. 2853PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This is a direct appeal from a judgment of sentence following a nolo contendere plea. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

The facts underlying this appeal, as determined by the trial court, are as follows:

[Appellant] entered the enclosed MAC machine area of Mellon Bank, located at 5500 Germantown Avenue, at 1:00 on the afternoon of December 15, 1988. He then pointed a loaded revolver at Philip Weiser, and demanded money. While the [appellant] was accosting Weiser, an elderly gentleman, Mr. Tucker, came into the area, and the [appellant] similarly confronted him. Dr. Weiser…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. DeversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. TuckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. McClendonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API