Byrne v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRETT, Judge:
The crux of this decision turns on this Court’s interpretation of the latitude granted the prosecutor both in conducting cross-examination and delivering closing argument. The alleged misconduct occurred in both stages of this bifurcated trial.
Appellant, James Clinton Byrne, was convicted of Knowingly Concealing Stolen Property, After Former Conviction of a Felony, in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CRF-77-2611, pursuant to 21 O.S. 1971, § 1713, and Laws 1976, Ch. 94, § 1, now 21 O.S.Supp. 1980, § 51, as amended by Laws, 1978, Ch. 281, § 1. The District Court…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- State v. RuleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Thigpen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Drury v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
- Fiorot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- Short v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.