Clark v. Dedina
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEVY, Justice.
Appellant, the maker of a promissory note, seeks reversal of a summary judgment granted in favor of the payee thereof.
In his first point of error, appellant urges that the trial court erred in assessing post-judgment interest at the rate of 18% per annum, arguing that the maximum allowable by statute is 10%. 1 Pursuant to Rule 434 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, we modify the judgment so as to provide that interest will accrue on the amount of the award at the rate of 10% per annum from and after February 8, 1983, the date of judgment. Earl Hayes Rents Cars &…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Town North National Bank v. BroaddusTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. Gar-Dal, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
- Seale v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Hudnall v. Tyler Bank and Trust CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Simpson v. MBank Dallas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Cockrell v. Republic Mortgage Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Barrand, Inc. v. Whataburger, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Rockwall Commons Associates, Ltd. v. MRC Mortgage Grantor Trust I, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.