Legal Opinion

Bristol, Litynski, Wojcik, P. C. v. Elliott

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward S. Conway, J.

This is a motion by the petitioner for an order directing respondent to furnish the petitioner with a verified statement of entries, pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 76 of the Lien Law.

Petitioner contracted with respondent to perform landscape architectural services on two properties owned by the respondent in the City of Albany, New York, and petitioner claims a balance due on the contract of $1,140.

On September 26, 1980, petitioner served on respondent a demand for a verified statement of entries pursuant to section 76 of the Lien Law. The demand…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andrew Velez Construction, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. (In Re Andrew Velez Construction, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Pellic Development Corp. v. Whitestone Equities Farmingdale Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Mike Building & Contracting, Inc. v. Just Homes, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Pellic Development Corp. v. Whitestone Equities Farmingdale Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API