Legal Opinion

United States v. Kilby

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided July 20, 1977No. NCM 77 0281PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUM, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas at a general court-martial bench trial, appellant was convicted of four specifications of larceny, in violation *940of Article 121, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 921, and one specification of unauthorized absence, in violation of Article 86, UCMJ. The sentence imposed by the military judge and approved on review below consists of reduction to E-l, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for 10 months and a bad conduct discharge.

Appellant assigns the following errors for our consideration:

I

TO HIS SUBSTANTIAL PREJUDICE, APPELLANT WAS DENIED THE…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. Drumgo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. United States v. CarpenterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. FurgasonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  2. United States v. BeattyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. BowieU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. DavisonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
  5. United States v. FrederickU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API