United States v. Kilby
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
BAUM, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas at a general court-martial bench trial, appellant was convicted of four specifications of larceny, in violation *940of Article 121, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 921, and one specification of unauthorized absence, in violation of Article 86, UCMJ. The sentence imposed by the military judge and approved on review below consists of reduction to E-l, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for 10 months and a bad conduct discharge.
Appellant assigns the following errors for our consideration:
I
TO HIS SUBSTANTIAL PREJUDICE, APPELLANT WAS DENIED THE…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Drumgo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- United States v. CarpenterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. FurgasonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. BeattyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. BowieU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. DavisonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. FrederickU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.