Legal Opinion

Riff v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1929No. Appeals, 165 and 166PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

Center Avenue, extending in an easterly and westerly direction, in Pittsburgh, has a paved cartway of the width of thirty-six feet. In the center thereof is defendant’s double track electric street railway, — that to the south being eastbound. This leaves a space of ten and one-half feet on each side of the rails. On the afternoon of September 17, 1927, the plaintiff, Mrs. Riff, while a passenger on a westbound car was injured by a collision between it and an autotruck. The suit brought to recover for the injuries thus sustained resulted in verdicts and judgments…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. McLaughlin v. MonaghanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. O'Malley v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mason v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Pfordt v. Educators Beneficial Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Hendricks v. Continental InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Fisher Et Ux. v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Schmidt v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API