Legal Opinion

Fisher Et Ux. v. Allegheny County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1936No. Appeal, 155PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

In the widening, relocation and construction of State Highway Route No. 72, a part of the property of George E. Fisher and his wife situate in Richland Township, Allegheny County, was appropriated. The property consisted of a farm of 174.8 acres and was bisected by the Butler-Plank Road. This road was relocated, becoming State Route No. 72. The right-of-way of the new road within plaintiffs’ farm is entirely without the lines of the old right-of-way and is partly through a “30-foot-deep cut” on plaintiffs’ land. Of plaintiffs’ farm a strip 60 feet in width and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. McKee, Tr. v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Regina v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Tate-Jones & Co. v. Union Electric Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Henkel v. Wabash Pittsburg Terminal RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heil v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Stoner v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Young v. Upper Yoder Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Brown & Vaughn Development Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Pittsburgh Terminal Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API