Merrick & Coe v. Modlin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Original ■ action (instituted in the Supreme Court by Merrick & Coe, petitioners, to reverse award made by State Industrial Commission, respondent, in favor of C. C. Modlin, respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.
Merrick & Coe instituted this action originally in this court to have -reviewed an award -made on the 13tih day of October, 1921, by the Industrial Commission awarding C. C. Modlin $12.40 per week until termination of his .disability, not to exceed the limitation prescribed by law.
It appears from the brief of counsel for the petitioners that the respondent C. C. Modlin received an accidental injury on or about the 11th day of March, 1921, while employed by Merrick & Coe, a copartnership, engaged in tihe work of drilling oil wells. There is no reference in the record, or the order making the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- American Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Claim of Winfield v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Atlas Wiring Co. v. DorchesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Teague v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Eagle Creek Oil Co. v. GregstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Loffland Bros. Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.