Legal Opinion

Eagle Creek Oil Co. v. Gregston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 13, 1924No. 13336PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

Error is assigned upon the action of the trial court in overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial. Several specifications of error arise under this assignment, but in the view taken of the cáse here it will only be necessary to discuss those numbered 5 and 7, which' read as follows:

“5. Said court -erred in refusing and ruling out competent and- legal evidence on the part of the plaintiff in error.
"7. Said court erred in giving the following instructions to the jury, to wit: Instructions 4, 5, and 6.”

Plaintiff alleged and proved a failure on the part of defendant to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lewis & Clark County v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Ponca City Ice Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. BluntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Pine Belt Lumber Co. v. RiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Ice v. GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Tindall Motor Co., Inc. v. MankinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Workman v. Anderson Music Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Bell v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API