Eagle Creek Oil Co. v. Gregston
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, O.
Error is assigned upon the action of the trial court in overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial. Several specifications of error arise under this assignment, but in the view taken of the cáse here it will only be necessary to discuss those numbered 5 and 7, which' read as follows:
“5. Said court -erred in refusing and ruling out competent and- legal evidence on the part of the plaintiff in error.
"7. Said court erred in giving the following instructions to the jury, to wit: Instructions 4, 5, and 6.”
Plaintiff alleged and proved a failure on the part of defendant to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lewis & Clark County v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Ponca City Ice Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. BluntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Pine Belt Lumber Co. v. RiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Ice v. GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Tindall Motor Co., Inc. v. MankinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Workman v. Anderson Music Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Bell v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.