Legal Opinion
Nasir v. Sacramento County Office of District Attorney
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1992No. C011501PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
In this appeal we examine the procedural requirements for a nonjudicial forfeiture of property seized for illegal drug trafficking. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11470 et seq.) Among other things, the procedural statute governing such an administrative forfeiture requires the district attorney to give notice to the owner of the seized property setting forth the appraised value of the property as well as instructions for filing a claim. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11488.4, subds. (c), (j)(2) & (3); [all further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise indicated.) Although…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. $38,000.00 in United States Currency, David English and Michael William English, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Casey v. Overhead Door Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Bergeron v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Ramirez v. Tulare County District Attorney's OfficeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. $400California Court of Appeal · 1993
- City of San Diego v. KEVIN B.California Court of Appeal · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.