Legal Opinion

United States v. Harriet Ann Impink, United States of America v. Richard D. Bolanos

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 19, 1984No. 83-5077, 83-5079PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NELSON, Circuit Judge:

Defendants appeal from a conviction to manufacture and possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance. They argue that they were subjected to an improper warrantless search, justified by neither consent nor exigent circumstances. Additionally, they contend that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. Persuaded that the initial police entry was improper, we reverse on that ground and do not reach the sufficiency of the evidence issue.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In July 1982 Monique Guilbault leased a house in Jamul, California, to Richard…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. United States v. Brian A. Moreland, United States of America v. Brian A. MorelandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Espinosa v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Serafin Alfonso, Humberto Rayo, Fabian Mora, Primo Antonio Serrano-TellezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API