Legal Opinion

United States v. Carlos Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2019No. 17-3807; 17-3809PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Carlos Rodriguez and Michael Marcov appeal the sentences and restitutional requirements imposed by the district court 1 following their guilty pleas to wire fraud. Rodriguez and Marcov, and many others, participated in a scheme to obtain money from generally elderly victims in the Dubuque, Iowa, area and elsewhere by calling and telling them that relatives in the Dominican Republic had been jailed and that the relatives needed to wire money to get them out. Victims wired money to a person at a location provided by the callers. The criminal organization…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. FeemsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Honeycutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. OchoaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  2. United States v. Earl Cobb, IVCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Shawn HilliardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API